Proportion of Managerial Ownership

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 135 views

The Influence of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism on the Provision of Going Concern Audit Opinion in Banking Companies Listed on the IDX in 2010-2012

Introduction

The application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in companies is crucial to maintain public confidence, especially in the banking sector. This study aims to explore the influence of the GCG mechanism on giving a going concern audit opinion in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period 2010 to 2012. The focus of this study includes three GCG indicators, namely the proportion of managerial ownership, the proportion of the council Independent, and the existence of the Audit Committee.

The Importance of Good Corporate Governance in Banking

Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is an essential framework in company management, especially in the banking sector that faces high risk. The banking sector is considered a critical component of the financial system, and its stability is essential for economic growth. The application of GCG in banking companies can help maintain public confidence, reduce the risk of financial crises, and ensure the long-term sustainability of the company.

The Role of GCG Indicators in Determining Going Concern Audit Opinion

The GCG indicators used in this study are the proportion of managerial ownership, the proportion of the council Independent, and the existence of the Audit Committee. These indicators are considered essential in determining the going concern audit opinion, as they can affect the auditor's perception of the company's survival.

Proportion of Managerial Ownership: The proportion of managerial ownership is often considered to reduce conflict of interest. However, the results of this study indicate that this does not always have a direct impact on the Going Concern audit opinion. This could be caused by the high level of involvement of managers in decision making, which makes them more focused on short-term interests than the company's long-term continuity.
Proportion of Independent Council: The proportion of an independent council shows a significant negative effect on the Going Concern audit opinion. This may reflect that the independent council plays a role in maintaining high ethical and integrity standards. The independent council can be a critical voice that helps the company not only focus on profitability but also on the survival of the company as a whole.
Existence of Audit Committee: The existence of the audit committee is an important element in the GCG structure, as they are responsible for overseeing the audit process and integrity of financial statements. However, the results showing an insignificant influence can be interpreted that the existence of the audit committee is not fully effective in facing the challenges faced by banking companies.

Conclusion

This research provides a new insight about the importance of the GCG mechanism in determining the Going Concern audit opinion, especially in the context of banking in Indonesia. Banking companies need to focus more on strengthening the GCG structure, especially by paying attention to the role of the independent council, to increase public confidence and maintain financial stability in the future. Further research can be done to explore other factors that can affect audit opinion, as well as their impact on the company's long-term performance.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Strengthening the GCG Structure: Banking companies need to focus more on strengthening the GCG structure, especially by paying attention to the role of the independent council.
Improving the Effectiveness of the Audit Committee: The existence of the audit committee is not fully effective in facing the challenges faced by banking companies. Therefore, the audit committee needs to be improved to ensure that they can effectively oversee the audit process and integrity of financial statements.
Further Research: Further research can be done to explore other factors that can affect audit opinion, as well as their impact on the company's long-term performance.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Sample Size: The sample size used in this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Data Availability: The data used in this study is limited to the period 2010 to 2012, which may not reflect the current situation in the banking sector.
Methodology: The methodology used in this study is based on descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, which may not capture the complexity of the GCG mechanism.

Future Research Directions

Future research can be done to explore other factors that can affect audit opinion, as well as their impact on the company's long-term performance. Some potential research directions include:

Exploring Other GCG Indicators: Other GCG indicators, such as the proportion of non-executive directors, the existence of a risk management committee, and the implementation of internal control systems, can be explored to determine their impact on the going concern audit opinion.
Analyzing the Impact of GCG on Company Performance: The impact of GCG on company performance, including financial performance, market performance, and social responsibility, can be analyzed to determine the effectiveness of GCG in achieving its objectives.
Comparing the Effectiveness of GCG in Different Countries: The effectiveness of GCG in different countries can be compared to determine the best practices in implementing GCG in the banking sector.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Influence of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism on the Provision of Going Concern Audit Opinion in Banking Companies Listed on the IDX in 2010-2012

Q: What is Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and why is it important in the banking sector?

A: Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is an essential framework in company management, especially in the banking sector that faces high risk. The application of GCG in banking companies can help maintain public confidence, reduce the risk of financial crises, and ensure the long-term sustainability of the company.

Q: What are the three GCG indicators used in this study?

A: The three GCG indicators used in this study are:

Proportion of Managerial Ownership: The proportion of managerial ownership is often considered to reduce conflict of interest.
Proportion of Independent Council: The proportion of an independent council shows a significant negative effect on the Going Concern audit opinion.
Existence of Audit Committee: The existence of the audit committee is an important element in the GCG structure, as they are responsible for overseeing the audit process and integrity of financial statements.

Q: What is the significance of the independent council in maintaining company transparency and accountability?

A: The independent council plays a role in maintaining high ethical and integrity standards. The independent council can be a critical voice that helps the company not only focus on profitability but also on the survival of the company as a whole.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

Sample Size: The sample size used in this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Data Availability: The data used in this study is limited to the period 2010 to 2012, which may not reflect the current situation in the banking sector.
Methodology: The methodology used in this study is based on descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, which may not capture the complexity of the GCG mechanism.

Q: What are the recommendations for banking companies to strengthen the GCG structure?

A: Banking companies need to focus more on strengthening the GCG structure, especially by paying attention to the role of the independent council. The audit committee needs to be improved to ensure that they can effectively oversee the audit process and integrity of financial statements.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research can be done to explore other factors that can affect audit opinion, as well as their impact on the company's long-term performance. Some potential research directions include:

Exploring Other GCG Indicators: Other GCG indicators, such as the proportion of non-executive directors, the existence of a risk management committee, and the implementation of internal control systems, can be explored to determine their impact on the going concern audit opinion.
Analyzing the Impact of GCG on Company Performance: The impact of GCG on company performance, including financial performance, market performance, and social responsibility, can be analyzed to determine the effectiveness of GCG in achieving its objectives.
Comparing the Effectiveness of GCG in Different Countries: The effectiveness of GCG in different countries can be compared to determine the best practices in implementing GCG in the banking sector.