Mechanisms for Management of State Receivables in KP3N Medan

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 21 views

Debtor Responsibility/Debt Insurer in the Management of State Receivables (bad credit) at the Medan State Receivable Management Service Office (KP3N) in terms of Law No. 49 PRP 1960

Understanding State Receivables (Bad Credit) in Medan

State receivables, or better known as bad loans, refer to the amount of money that should be paid to the state or state agencies, both directly and indirectly. These receivables arise based on regulations, agreements, or other causes (Article 8 of Law No. 49 PRP of 1960). The increasing number of bank loans being jammed, especially in the current development era, has encouraged the formation of the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN) to handle bad loans originating from state finances.

It is essential to understand that the authority of the PUPN Chairperson in issuing a forced letter, which has a head "for the sake of justice based on the Almighty God," has the same power as the judge's decision in the civil case. This forced letter is final and cannot be submitted (Article 8 of Law No. 49 PRP of 1960). Furthermore, Article 12 of Law No. 49 PRP in 1960 requires government agencies and state bodies to submit receivables that are certain to be legally and legally existence to PUPN.

The Office of State Receivables Management Services (KP3N) is responsible for processing bad loans that have been received. Although KP3N is administratively under the Agency for State Receivables and Auction (BUPLN), the operation is carried out by KP3N. This highlights the importance of understanding the role of KP3N in managing state receivables in Medan.

Mechanisms for Management of State Receivables in KP3N Medan

Analytical descriptive research conducted in the city of Medan examines the criteria for determining bad loans, the process of obtaining state receivables, as well as the responsibility of the debtor. Based on the results of the study, the determination of bad credit criteria can vary, which is determined based on several factors:

*** Debtor Ability: ** Does the debtor have the ability to pay debts in accordance with the agreed agreement? *** Time term: ** Has credit due to more than 270 days (9 months) and still not paid? *** Arrears: ** Is the debtor in arrears in the principal and interest payments? *** Management: ** Is there negligence in the management of credit facilities?

The process of obtaining state receivables in Medan KP3N begins with receiving a bad credit report (SP3N). Next, the debtor will be called. If the debtor is present, the Minutes of Question and Answer and Statement together. If the debtor is not present at the first call, the second (last) call will be made, which will also produce a question and answer report and a joint statement. If the debtor remains absent, the KP3N will issue the determination of the amount of State Receivables (PJPN). After PJPN is issued, KP3N will issue a forced letter and deliver it to the debtor. If the debtor still has not paid off its debt, KP3N will issue a confiscation warrant (SPP) to confiscate a guarantee or property belonging to the debtor. The process ends with auction of guaranteed goods or wealth that has been confiscated.

Debtor Accountability in Completing Bad Credit

Based on the results of the study, debtors generally complete bad credit in various ways, including:

*** Auction: ** Debtors sell guaranteed goods that have been bound as loan collateral. *** Time relief: ** The debtor submits a time relief request to pay off debts by installments. *** Redemption: ** Debtor redeem one of the guaranteed items. *** Full repayment: ** Debtors pay off all the remaining debt.

Recommendations and Expectations

To increase the effectiveness of the management of state receivables and provide good services to the debtor, KP3N is advised to:

*** Persuasive Method: ** Applying permanent and successful persuasive methods in collecting receivables, in accordance with applicable regulations and the principles of agreement. *** Understanding with debtors: ** Increasing efforts to achieve understanding with the debtor in the process of completing bad credit.

It is hoped that the debtor has good faith to pay off its debt in accordance with the procedures that apply to PUPN/KP3N. With these steps, it is hoped that the process of managing state receivables can run more smoothly and effectively, and provide a fair solution for all parties.

Conclusion

The management of state receivables in Medan is a complex process that involves various stakeholders, including the debtor, KP3N, and PUPN. Understanding the criteria for determining bad loans, the process of obtaining state receivables, and the responsibility of the debtor is crucial in ensuring the effective management of state receivables. By applying persuasive methods and increasing efforts to achieve understanding with the debtor, KP3N can provide good services to the debtor and increase the effectiveness of the management of state receivables.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on the following areas:

The impact of the persuasive method on the effectiveness of the management of state receivables
The role of PUPN in the management of state receivables
The relationship between the debtor and KP3N in the process of completing bad credit
The effectiveness of the confiscation warrant (SPP) in collecting receivables

By conducting further research in these areas, it is hoped that the management of state receivables in Medan can be improved, and the effectiveness of the process can be increased.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Debtor Responsibility/Debt Insurer in the Management of State Receivables (bad credit) at the Medan State Receivable Management Service Office (KP3N)

Q1: What is the definition of state receivables (bad credit)?

A1: State receivables, or better known as bad loans, refer to the amount of money that should be paid to the state or state agencies, both directly and indirectly. These receivables arise based on regulations, agreements, or other causes (Article 8 of Law No. 49 PRP of 1960).

Q2: What is the role of the State Receivable Affairs Committee (PUPN) in managing state receivables?

A2: PUPN is responsible for handling bad loans originating from state finances. The authority of the PUPN Chairperson in issuing a forced letter has the same power as the judge's decision in the civil case.

Q3: What is the process of obtaining state receivables in Medan KP3N?

A3: The process begins with receiving a bad credit report (SP3N). Next, the debtor will be called. If the debtor is present, the Minutes of Question and Answer and Statement together. If the debtor is not present at the first call, the second (last) call will be made, which will also produce a question and answer report and a joint statement.

Q4: What happens if the debtor remains absent after the second call?

A4: If the debtor remains absent, the KP3N will issue the determination of the amount of State Receivables (PJPN). After PJPN is issued, KP3N will issue a forced letter and deliver it to the debtor. If the debtor still has not paid off its debt, KP3N will issue a confiscation warrant (SPP) to confiscate a guarantee or property belonging to the debtor.

Q5: What are the options available to debtors to complete bad credit?

A5: Debtors generally complete bad credit in various ways, including:

Q6: What are the recommendations for KP3N to increase the effectiveness of the management of state receivables?

A6: KP3N is advised to:

Q7: What is the impact of the persuasive method on the effectiveness of the management of state receivables?

A7: The persuasive method can increase the effectiveness of the management of state receivables by encouraging debtors to pay off their debts in a timely manner.

Q8: What is the role of PUPN in the management of state receivables?

A8: PUPN is responsible for handling bad loans originating from state finances and ensuring that the management of state receivables is carried out in accordance with applicable regulations.

Q9: What is the relationship between the debtor and KP3N in the process of completing bad credit?

A9: The debtor and KP3N have a contractual relationship, where the debtor is obligated to pay off their debts, and KP3N is responsible for collecting the debts.

Q10: What is the effectiveness of the confiscation warrant (SPP) in collecting receivables?

A10: The confiscation warrant (SPP) is an effective tool in collecting receivables, as it allows KP3N to confiscate a guarantee or property belonging to the debtor if they fail to pay off their debts.

Conclusion