Implementing effective internal controls

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 65 views

Reveal the Secret Behind Financial Statements Fraud: Fraud Diamond Analysis in Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesian Stock Exchange

Introduction

Financial statements fraud is a significant concern for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders in the financial industry. The Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) is no exception, with numerous cases of financial statements fraud reported in recent years. To combat this issue, it is essential to understand the factors that contribute to financial statements fraud. This study aims to explore the factors that trigger financial statements fraud in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX using the theory of "Fraud Diamond" as an analysis framework.

Background

The Fraud Diamond theory, developed by Donald Cressey, divides fraud into four main elements: pressure, opportunities, rationalization, and capability. Pressure refers to the internal or external forces that drive individuals to commit fraud, such as unrealistic performance targets or tight business competition. Opportunities refer to the weaknesses in a company's internal control systems that allow fraud to occur, such as lack of effective supervision or lack of transparency. Rationalization refers to the way individuals justify their actions, even if they violate ethics or law. Capability refers to the expertise and skills required to commit fraud.

Methodology

This study focused on 195 manufacturing companies listed on the IDX during the 2018-2020 period. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 65 companies for three years, resulting in 195 units of analysis. Data was collected through literature studies and documentation methods. Data analysis was carried out using logistic regression with the help of SPSS software.

Results

The results of this study showed that external pressure had a positive influence on financial statements fraud. This means that the greater the external pressure faced by the company, the higher the possibility of fraud. Conversely, financial targets and ineffective supervision had a negative influence on financial statements fraud. This shows that the higher the financial target and the weaker supervision, the less likely to occur fraud.

Interestingly, factors such as financial stability, auditor changes, and changes in directors did not have a significant effect on financial statements fraud in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. This finding provides a new perspective on the factors that influence financial statements fraud, where external pressure plays an important role, while financial targets and ineffective supervision actually have an inhibiting influence.

Analysis of Fraud Diamond Elements

Pressure

Pressure is a significant factor in financial statements fraud. This factor includes internal pressure such as unrealistic performance targets, or external pressures such as tight business competition. In this study, external pressure has proven to have a significant effect, showing that companies that face high external pressure are more susceptible to fraud.

Opportunities

Opportunities refer to weaknesses in a company's internal control systems that allow fraud to occur, such as lack of effective supervision, lack of transparency, or lack of auditor competence. The results showed that ineffective supervision had a negative influence on financial statements fraud, meaning companies with weak supervision were more easily trapped in fraud.

Rationalization

Rationalization is the way individuals justify their actions, even if they violate ethics or law. For example, a manager may reason that his actions to manipulate financial statements are needed to save companies from bankruptcy. This study found no significant effect of this factor.

Ability

Ability refers to the expertise and skills required to commit fraud. This study shows that the change of auditors and the change of directors has no significant influence on financial statements fraud.

Implications and Recommendations

This study provides important insights for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders. The results show that external pressure is the main factor that encourages financial statements fraud. Therefore, it is essential for companies to have a strong internal mechanism to control external pressure that can trigger fraud.

This study also shows that effective supervision can be the key to preventing financial statements fraud. Companies must ensure that their internal control system is adequate and effective in preventing and detecting fraud.

Conclusion

This study made a significant contribution to the understanding of the factors that influence financial statements fraud. However, keep in mind that this research has several limitations. For example, this research only focuses on manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. Therefore, the results of research may not be generalized to companies in other sectors or to other countries.

Nevertheless, this research provides an important starting point for further research. Future research can expand its focus to cover other sectors, other countries, and other factors that might affect financial statements fraud.

Vital Records

This study used a purposive sampling technique to select 65 companies for three years, resulting in 195 units of analysis.
Data was collected through literature studies and documentation methods.
Data analysis was carried out using logistic regression with the help of SPSS software.
The results showed that external pressure had a positive influence on financial statements fraud.
Financial targets and ineffective supervision had a negative influence on financial statements fraud.
Factors such as financial stability, auditor changes, and changes in directors did not have a significant effect on financial statements fraud.

References

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the sociology of occupation fraud. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). (2020). Annual Report 2020.

Future Research Directions

Expand the focus to cover other sectors, such as service or retail companies.
Conduct research in other countries to compare the results with those in Indonesia.
Investigate other factors that might affect financial statements fraud, such as corporate governance or internal control systems.
Q&A: Understanding Financial Statements Fraud and the Fraud Diamond Theory

Introduction

Financial statements fraud is a significant concern for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders in the financial industry. To combat this issue, it is essential to understand the factors that contribute to financial statements fraud. In this article, we will answer some frequently asked questions about financial statements fraud and the Fraud Diamond theory.

Q: What is financial statements fraud?

A: Financial statements fraud refers to the intentional misrepresentation or omission of information in a company's financial statements to deceive stakeholders, such as investors or regulators.

Q: What is the Fraud Diamond theory?

A: The Fraud Diamond theory, developed by Donald Cressey, divides fraud into four main elements: pressure, opportunities, rationalization, and capability. Pressure refers to the internal or external forces that drive individuals to commit fraud, such as unrealistic performance targets or tight business competition. Opportunities refer to the weaknesses in a company's internal control systems that allow fraud to occur, such as lack of effective supervision or lack of transparency. Rationalization refers to the way individuals justify their actions, even if they violate ethics or law. Capability refers to the expertise and skills required to commit fraud.

Q: What are the four elements of the Fraud Diamond theory?

A: The four elements of the Fraud Diamond theory are:

Pressure: Internal or external forces that drive individuals to commit fraud, such as unrealistic performance targets or tight business competition.
Opportunities: Weaknesses in a company's internal control systems that allow fraud to occur, such as lack of effective supervision or lack of transparency.
Rationalization: The way individuals justify their actions, even if they violate ethics or law.
Capability: The expertise and skills required to commit fraud.

Q: What is the significance of the Fraud Diamond theory?

A: The Fraud Diamond theory provides a framework for understanding the factors that contribute to financial statements fraud. By identifying the pressure, opportunities, rationalization, and capability elements, companies can take steps to prevent and detect fraud.

Q: What are some common types of financial statements fraud?

A: Some common types of financial statements fraud include:

Asset misstatement: Misrepresenting the value or existence of assets, such as inventory or property.
Revenue recognition: Misrepresenting revenue or income, such as by recognizing revenue prematurely or overstating sales.
Expense misstatement: Misrepresenting expenses, such as by understating or overstating costs.
Accounting manipulation: Manipulating accounting records to misrepresent financial performance or position.

Q: How can companies prevent financial statements fraud?

A: Companies can prevent financial statements fraud by:

Implementing effective internal controls: Establishing and maintaining a robust internal control system to prevent and detect fraud.
Conducting regular audits: Conducting regular audits to detect and prevent fraud.
Providing training and education: Providing training and education to employees on the importance of ethics and the prevention of fraud.
Encouraging a culture of integrity: Encouraging a culture of integrity and transparency within the organization.

Q: What are some common red flags for financial statements fraud?

A: Some common red flags for financial statements fraud include:

Unusual or unexplained transactions: Transactions that are unusual or unexplained, such as large or frequent transactions.
Inconsistencies in financial statements: Inconsistencies in financial statements, such as discrepancies in revenue or expense recognition.
Lack of transparency: Lack of transparency in financial reporting, such as failure to disclose material information.
Unusual or unexplained changes in financial performance: Unusual or unexplained changes in financial performance, such as sudden increases in revenue or decreases in expenses.

Conclusion

Financial statements fraud is a significant concern for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders in the financial industry. By understanding the factors that contribute to financial statements fraud, companies can take steps to prevent and detect fraud. The Fraud Diamond theory provides a framework for understanding the pressure, opportunities, rationalization, and capability elements that contribute to financial statements fraud. By identifying these elements, companies can take steps to prevent and detect fraud and maintain the integrity of their financial statements.