Frequency of Bibliographic Strength

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 138 views

Analysis of the Strength of the Bibliographic Couple (Bibliographic Coupling) in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Identification of Journal Availability in Database Proquest

Introduction

In the realm of academic research, understanding the strength of bibliographic couples (bibliographic coupling) is crucial in evaluating the level of connection between articles in a particular journal. This study aims to explore the level of strength of bibliographic couples in the journal * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * and identify the availability of these journals in the database Proquest. Through a descriptive approach and documentation method, this research analyzes 29 articles that have the person in charge and a list of references.

Methodology

The methodology employed in this study involves a descriptive approach and documentation method. A total of 29 articles were analyzed, which have the person in charge and a list of references. The analysis focused on identifying the bibliographic couples and categorizing them based on their strength. The strength of the bibliographic couple was determined by the number of shared references between two articles.

Results

The results of the analysis showed that there were a total of 406 bibliographic pairs, which were divided into several categories of strength. Of the total, as many as 350 pairs of articles (86.20%) have the power of Bibliographic couples 0, which indicate that these articles do not cite other documents. Furthermore, 36 pairs (8.86%) have a strength of 1, 13 pairs (3.20%) have a power of 2, 3 pairs (0.73%) have a power of 3, 1 pair (0.24%) has a power of 4, 2 pairs (0.49%) have a strength of 8, and finally, 1 pair (0.24%) has a power of 13.

Frequency of Bibliographic Strength

The frequency of the strength of the bibliographic couple shows that articles that have a bibliographic partner are relatively less than those who don't have them. Only 56 pairs of articles (13.79%) show bibliographic strength with an average strength of 9, while 350 couples who do not have bibliographic power (86.20%) show that these articles are less interrelated in terms of references used. This indicates that the research published in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * does not fully refer to the same documents that have been previously issued.

Journal Availability in Database Proquest

In addition, * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * can be accessed through a medline Proquest database, which is a subscription service for the University of North Sumatra. This allows researchers and students to access the journal online, expand their knowledge in the fields of cancer and oncology.

Implications of the Study

By understanding the strength of the bibliographic pair, researchers can evaluate the level of connection between articles in this journal, which in turn can be an indicator of the quality and relevance of the research conducted. The availability of journals in the database Proquest also makes it easy for researchers to conduct comprehensive literature studies, which are very important in producing quality research.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the analysis of the strength of the bibliographic pair in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * provides important insights about the pattern of quotes in the oncology literature, as well as highlighting the importance of access to academic databases to support further research.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Researchers should consider the strength of bibliographic couples when evaluating the quality and relevance of research conducted in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians *.
The availability of journals in the database Proquest should be utilized to conduct comprehensive literature studies, which are essential in producing quality research.
The University of North Sumatra should consider subscribing to the medline Proquest database to provide researchers and students with access to the journal online.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The analysis was limited to 29 articles, which may not be representative of the entire journal.
The strength of the bibliographic couple was determined by the number of shared references between two articles, which may not be the only factor influencing the strength of the bibliographic couple.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

Conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the bibliographic couples in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians *.
Investigating the factors that influence the strength of the bibliographic couple.
Examining the impact of the availability of journals in the database Proquest on the quality and relevance of research conducted.
Q&A: Analysis of the Strength of the Bibliographic Couple (Bibliographic Coupling) in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Identification of Journal Availability in Database Proquest

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is bibliographic coupling?

A: Bibliographic coupling is a method used to identify and analyze the relationships between articles in a journal. It involves identifying the shared references between two articles and categorizing them based on their strength.

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to explore the level of strength of bibliographic couples in the journal * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * and identify the availability of these journals in the database Proquest.

Q: How was the analysis conducted?

A: The analysis was conducted using a descriptive approach and documentation method. A total of 29 articles were analyzed, which have the person in charge and a list of references.

Q: What were the results of the analysis?

A: The results of the analysis showed that there were a total of 406 bibliographic pairs, which were divided into several categories of strength. Of the total, as many as 350 pairs of articles (86.20%) have the power of Bibliographic couples 0, which indicate that these articles do not cite other documents.

Q: What does the frequency of bibliographic strength indicate?

A: The frequency of bibliographic strength indicates that articles that have a bibliographic partner are relatively less than those who don't have them. Only 56 pairs of articles (13.79%) show bibliographic strength with an average strength of 9, while 350 couples who do not have bibliographic power (86.20%) show that these articles are less interrelated in terms of references used.

Q: Can * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * be accessed through a medline Proquest database?

A: Yes, * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians * can be accessed through a medline Proquest database, which is a subscription service for the University of North Sumatra.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: By understanding the strength of the bibliographic pair, researchers can evaluate the level of connection between articles in this journal, which in turn can be an indicator of the quality and relevance of the research conducted. The availability of journals in the database Proquest also makes it easy for researchers to conduct comprehensive literature studies, which are very important in producing quality research.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

The analysis was limited to 29 articles, which may not be representative of the entire journal.
The strength of the bibliographic couple was determined by the number of shared references between two articles, which may not be the only factor influencing the strength of the bibliographic couple.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research directions include:

Conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the bibliographic couples in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians *.
Investigating the factors that influence the strength of the bibliographic couple.
Examining the impact of the availability of journals in the database Proquest on the quality and relevance of research conducted.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Researchers should consider the strength of bibliographic couples when evaluating the quality and relevance of research conducted in * CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians *.
The availability of journals in the database Proquest should be utilized to conduct comprehensive literature studies, which are essential in producing quality research.
The University of North Sumatra should consider subscribing to the medline Proquest database to provide researchers and students with access to the journal online.