Conduct further studies to identify other factors that affect job satisfaction

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 27 views

Types of Leadership and Job Satisfaction: A Correlational Study at the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat

Introduction

Leadership is a crucial factor in determining the success of an organization. It plays a significant role in shaping the work environment, motivating employees, and influencing job satisfaction. The Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat, like many other organizations, faces the challenge of maintaining high levels of employee job satisfaction. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the type of leadership and employee job satisfaction in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat. By understanding this relationship, the study hopes to provide insights that can inform management decisions and improve organizational performance.

Background

Leadership is a multifaceted concept that encompasses various styles, approaches, and behaviors. Effective leadership is essential for creating a positive work environment, motivating employees, and promoting job satisfaction. Research has shown that leadership styles can significantly impact employee job satisfaction, with some studies suggesting a positive correlation between transformational leadership and job satisfaction (Bass, 1985; Avolio et al., 2009). However, other studies have found that transactional leadership can lead to lower levels of job satisfaction (House & Mitchell, 1974).

Methodology

This study employed a correlational research design, which involves analyzing the relationship between two variables: the type of leadership and employee job satisfaction. The research population consisted of 199 employees at the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat in 2010. The research sample was chosen using proportional stratified random sampling techniques, which involved random sampling proportional to each employee strata, resulting in 67 respondents.

Data was collected through two methods: library research and field research. Library research involved reviewing existing literature on leadership and job satisfaction, while field research involved collecting data through surveys and interviews with employees. Data analysis was carried out using a single table analysis technique, cross-table analysis, and hypothesis test using the formula for the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient, processed with the SPSS 16 application.

Results

The results of this study showed a low but significant relationship between the type of leadership and employee job satisfaction, with a hospital value of 0.364. This means that the better the type of leadership applied, the higher the level of employee job satisfaction. The significance test showed that the influence of leadership type variables on significant job satisfaction was 13%, indicating that despite the low relationship, the influence of the type of leadership on employee job satisfaction in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat was significant.

Discussion

The results of this study have important implications for management in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat. Although the relationship is low, the influence of leadership type on significant job satisfaction shows that leaders need to pay attention to their leadership style to increase employee job satisfaction. This study also highlights the importance of considering other factors that can affect employee job satisfaction, such as motivation, reward systems, work environment, and relationships between employees.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are proposed:

Increasing leaders' awareness about the influence of leadership styles on job satisfaction: Leadership training that focuses on building positive and supportive leadership styles can be done.
Applying programs that focus on developing motivation, reward systems, and conducive work environment: This program can help improve employee job satisfaction as a whole.
Conduct further studies to identify other factors that affect job satisfaction: Deeper research can help understand more comprehensively the factors that affect employee job satisfaction.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction. The findings of this study suggest that leadership style is an important factor in determining employee job satisfaction, and that leaders need to pay attention to their leadership style to increase employee job satisfaction. The recommendations proposed in this study can inform management decisions and improve organizational performance in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, the study only focused on the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction, and did not consider other factors that may affect job satisfaction. Future studies can build on this study by exploring other factors that affect job satisfaction and by using larger sample sizes.

Future Research Directions

Future research can build on this study by exploring other factors that affect job satisfaction, such as motivation, reward systems, work environment, and relationships between employees. Additionally, future studies can use larger sample sizes and more advanced statistical techniques to analyze the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction.

References

Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 81-97.
Frequently Asked Questions: Types of Leadership and Job Satisfaction

Q: What is the main focus of this study?

A: The main focus of this study is to investigate the relationship between the type of leadership and employee job satisfaction in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it provides insights into the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction, which can inform management decisions and improve organizational performance.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size and the fact that it only focused on the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction, without considering other factors that may affect job satisfaction.

Q: What are the recommendations proposed in this study?

A: The recommendations proposed in this study include increasing leaders' awareness about the influence of leadership styles on job satisfaction, applying programs that focus on developing motivation, reward systems, and conducive work environment, and conducting further studies to identify other factors that affect job satisfaction.

Q: What are the implications of this study for management in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat?

A: The implications of this study for management in the Langkat Regency Regional Secretariat are that leaders need to pay attention to their leadership style to increase employee job satisfaction, and that other factors such as motivation, reward systems, work environment, and relationships between employees should be considered.

Q: What are the future research directions suggested by this study?

A: The future research directions suggested by this study include exploring other factors that affect job satisfaction, using larger sample sizes, and more advanced statistical techniques to analyze the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The key findings of this study are that there is a low but significant relationship between the type of leadership and employee job satisfaction, with a hospital value of 0.364, and that the influence of leadership type variables on significant job satisfaction is 13%.

Q: What is the contribution of this study to the existing body of knowledge on leadership and job satisfaction?

A: The contribution of this study to the existing body of knowledge on leadership and job satisfaction is that it provides insights into the relationship between leadership and job satisfaction, and highlights the importance of considering other factors that may affect job satisfaction.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study for organizations?

A: The practical implications of this study for organizations are that leaders need to pay attention to their leadership style to increase employee job satisfaction, and that other factors such as motivation, reward systems, work environment, and relationships between employees should be considered.

Q: What are the future implications of this study?

A: The future implications of this study are that it can inform management decisions and improve organizational performance, and that it can contribute to the development of more effective leadership styles and job satisfaction strategies.

Q: What are the limitations of the data collection methods used in this study?

A: The limitations of the data collection methods used in this study include the fact that they were limited to surveys and interviews, and that they may not have captured the full range of factors that affect job satisfaction.

Q: What are the implications of this study for leadership development programs?

A: The implications of this study for leadership development programs are that they should focus on building positive and supportive leadership styles, and that they should consider other factors that may affect job satisfaction.

Q: What are the implications of this study for organizational performance?

A: The implications of this study for organizational performance are that it can inform management decisions and improve organizational performance, and that it can contribute to the development of more effective leadership styles and job satisfaction strategies.