Builds a strong foundation

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 11 views

The Art of Persuasion: Objective vs. Subjective Talking Points

When it comes to making a persuasive argument, the choice of talking points can make all the difference. While some may argue that using subjective talking points is more effective, the truth is that objective talking points are often the better choice. In this article, we'll explore the differences between objective and subjective talking points and why objective talking points are generally more persuasive.

Objective Talking Points: The Foundation of Persuasion

Objective talking points are based on facts, data, and evidence. They are verifiable and can be supported by credible sources. When using objective talking points, you're building a strong foundation for your argument, which can help to establish credibility and trust with your audience. Objective talking points can include statistics, research findings, expert opinions, and historical data.

Subjective Talking Points: The Pitfalls of Persuasion

Subjective talking points, on the other hand, are based on personal opinions, emotions, and biases. They can be influenced by individual perspectives and may not be supported by evidence. While subjective talking points can be effective in certain situations, they can also be misleading and may not be persuasive to everyone. Subjective talking points can include personal anecdotes, emotional appeals, and unsubstantiated claims.

The Risks of Using Subjective Talking Points

While using subjective talking points may seem like an easy way to make a persuasive argument, there are several risks to consider. Here are a few:

Lack of credibility: When you use subjective talking points, you may come across as untrustworthy or biased. This can damage your credibility and make it harder to persuade your audience.
Misleading information: Subjective talking points can be misleading or inaccurate, which can lead to confusion and mistrust.
Emotional manipulation: Subjective talking points can be used to manipulate emotions rather than present a logical argument. This can be seen as manipulative or even deceitful.
Limited appeal: Subjective talking points may only appeal to a specific audience or demographic, which can limit their effectiveness.

The Benefits of Using Objective Talking Points

On the other hand, using objective talking points has several benefits. Here are a few:

Establishes credibility: Objective talking points can help establish credibility and trust with your audience.
Builds a strong foundation: Objective talking points provide a solid foundation for your argument, which can help to persuade your audience.
Increases persuasiveness: Objective talking points can be more persuasive than subjective talking points because they're based on facts and evidence.
Appeals to a wider audience: Objective talking points can appeal to a wider audience because they're based on verifiable information.

When to Use Subjective Talking Points

While objective talking points are generally more persuasive, there are certain situations where subjective talking points may be more effective. Here are a few:

Emotional appeals: Subjective talking points can be effective in situations where you need to appeal to emotions rather than logic.
Personal stories: Personal anecdotes and stories can be powerful persuasive tools, especially when they're used to illustrate a point or make a connection with the audience.
Creative expression: Subjective talking points can be used in creative expressions like art, music, or literature, where the goal is to evoke emotions and inspire imagination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while subjective talking points may seem like an easy way to make a persuasive argument, they can be misleading, manipulative, and limited in their appeal. Objective talking points, on the other hand, provide a solid foundation for your argument, establish credibility, and increase persuasiveness. By using objective talking points, you can build a strong case and persuade your audience more effectively.

Final Answer

A. False

It is generally better to use objective talking points instead of subjective talking points when making a persuasive argument.
Persuasion Q&A: Objective vs. Subjective Talking Points

In our previous article, we explored the differences between objective and subjective talking points and why objective talking points are generally more persuasive. Now, let's dive deeper into the world of persuasion with a Q&A session.

Q: What is the main difference between objective and subjective talking points?

A: The main difference between objective and subjective talking points is that objective talking points are based on facts, data, and evidence, while subjective talking points are based on personal opinions, emotions, and biases.

Q: Why are objective talking points more persuasive than subjective talking points?

A: Objective talking points are more persuasive because they provide a solid foundation for your argument, establish credibility, and increase persuasiveness. They're based on verifiable information, which makes them more trustworthy and convincing.

Q: Can subjective talking points be effective in certain situations?

A: Yes, subjective talking points can be effective in certain situations, such as when you need to appeal to emotions rather than logic, or when you're using personal stories to illustrate a point or make a connection with the audience.

Q: What are some common pitfalls of using subjective talking points?

A: Some common pitfalls of using subjective talking points include:

Lack of credibility
Misleading information
Emotional manipulation
Limited appeal

Q: How can I use objective talking points to build a strong case?

A: To build a strong case using objective talking points, follow these steps:

Research and gather credible sources
Use data and statistics to support your argument
Cite expert opinions and historical data
Use clear and concise language to present your argument

Q: Can I use both objective and subjective talking points in the same argument?

A: Yes, you can use both objective and subjective talking points in the same argument. However, be careful not to confuse or mislead your audience by using subjective talking points to support objective talking points.

Q: How can I avoid using subjective talking points in my argument?

A: To avoid using subjective talking points, follow these tips:

Focus on verifiable information
Use credible sources to support your argument
Avoid emotional appeals and personal anecdotes
Use clear and concise language to present your argument

Q: What are some common mistakes people make when using objective talking points?

A: Some common mistakes people make when using objective talking points include:

Using outdated or inaccurate information
Misinterpreting data or statistics
Failing to cite credible sources
Using complex language that's difficult to understand

Q: How can I improve my persuasive skills using objective talking points?

A: To improve your persuasive skills using objective talking points, follow these tips:

Practice using clear and concise language
Research and gather credible sources
Use data and statistics to support your argument
Cite expert opinions and historical data

Conclusion

In conclusion, using objective talking points is a powerful way to build a strong case and persuade your audience. By avoiding subjective talking points and focusing on verifiable information, you can establish credibility, increase persuasiveness, and build a strong foundation for your argument. Remember to practice using clear and concise language, research and gather credible sources, and use data and statistics to support your argument.

Final Tips

Always verify information before using it in your argument
Use credible sources to support your argument
Avoid emotional appeals and personal anecdotes
Use clear and concise language to present your argument

By following these tips and using objective talking points, you can become a more persuasive and effective communicator.