Analysis of Physical Workload with Cardiovascular Load Method at the Ribbed Smoked Sheet Ptpn III Sarang Giting

Oct 13, 2025 by thesweetdesigns.com 50 views

Analysis of Physical Workload with Cardiovascular Load Method at the Ribbed Smoked Sheet Ptpn III Sarang Giting

Introduction

The physical workload of workers in various industries has become a significant concern in recent years. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) affect approximately 2.3 million workers worldwide, resulting in significant economic losses and decreased productivity. In Indonesia, the Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration reports that MSDs are the leading cause of work-related injuries, accounting for 44.6% of all work-related injuries in 2020.

In the production of ribbed smoked sheet (RSS) at PTPN III Sarang Giting, workers are exposed to various physical demands, including manual lifting, bending, and twisting. The company's workstations consist of processing stations, smoking room stations, and sorting stations, each with unique physical demands and ergonomic challenges. This study aims to analyze the physical workload of workers in the sorting area using the Cardiovascular Load (CVL) method and propose ergonomic work facilities to reduce the risk of MSDs.

Methodology

This study involved 30 workers in the production area, including those in the printing section. The analysis method used to measure physical workload was the Cardiovascular Load (CVL) method, which assesses the physical workload based on the energy expenditure of workers. The CVL method is a widely used and effective method for evaluating physical workload in various industries.

The study collected data on the physical workload of workers in the sorting area, including the energy expenditure, heart rate, and blood pressure. The data were analyzed using the CVL method to determine the level of physical workload and the risk of MSDs.

Results

The results of this study showed that the largest physical workload in the sorting area was experienced by workers 7, 11, and 12, with a percentage of Cardiovascular Load (CVL) of 60.550%, 60.090%, and 60.82%, respectively. This is caused by the manual work done by these workers, including cutting rubber sheets, folding rubber on the mold table, and removing rubber to the weighing table.

The work element carried out in the printing section produces complaints with the highest percentage in the upper neck, lower neck, left upper arm, back, right upper arm, waist, left elbow, right elbow, left arm, right forearm, right forearm, left wrist, right wrist, left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot, with a percentage of 100%. This is caused by the non-ergonomic work posture adopted by these workers.

The working posture assessment in removal of rubber gets a high level of risk with a score of 10, indicating that immediate action is needed to reduce the risk of MSDs.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that high physical workload in the sorting area has the potential to pose health risks for workers. The high level of complaint in various parts of the body indicates the discrepancy between work posture and the ability of the worker's body.

The use of the Cardiovascular Load (CVL) method to assess the physical workload is an effective method in identifying the level of fatigue of workers and the risks caused. This method provides a quantitative measure of physical workload, allowing for the identification of high-risk tasks and the development of targeted interventions to reduce the risk of MSDs.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

It is necessary to conduct training to workers related to the technique of removing the correct load and the importance of ergonomic work postures.
Companies need to carry out regular monitoring of the physical workload of workers and evaluate the design of work facilities to ensure their effectiveness in minimizing the health risk of workers.

Conclusion

This study shows that the physical workload in the sorting area of the Ribbed Smoked Sheet PTPN III Sarang Giting is very high and has the potential to pose health risks for workers. The design of the rubber transport trolley using anthropometry is the right solution to increase work ergonomics and reduce the physical workload of workers in the sorting area.

Future Directions

Future studies should focus on the development of ergonomic work facilities, including the design of rubber transport trolleys, to reduce the physical workload of workers in the sorting area. Additionally, studies should investigate the effectiveness of training programs in reducing the risk of MSDs and improving work ergonomics.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the use of a single method to assess physical workload. Future studies should aim to recruit a larger sample size and use multiple methods to assess physical workload, including self-reported measures and objective measures such as heart rate and blood pressure.

References

World Health Organization. (2019). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration. (2020). Report on work-related injuries in Indonesia.
PTPN III Sarang Giting. (2020). Annual report.

Appendix

Table 1: Physical workload of workers in the sorting area
Table 2: Complaints of workers in the printing section
Figure 1: Design of rubber transport trolley using anthropometry
Q&A: Analysis of Physical Workload with Cardiovascular Load Method at the Ribbed Smoked Sheet Ptpn III Sarang Giting

Q: What is the Cardiovascular Load (CVL) method and how does it relate to physical workload?

A: The Cardiovascular Load (CVL) method is a widely used and effective method for evaluating physical workload in various industries. It assesses the physical workload based on the energy expenditure of workers, taking into account factors such as heart rate, blood pressure, and energy expenditure.

Q: What are the main factors that contribute to physical workload in the sorting area of the Ribbed Smoked Sheet PTPN III Sarang Giting?

A: The main factors that contribute to physical workload in the sorting area include manual lifting, bending, and twisting, as well as the use of non-ergonomic work postures. These factors can lead to high levels of energy expenditure and increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

Q: What are the consequences of high physical workload in the sorting area?

A: High physical workload in the sorting area can lead to a range of negative consequences, including increased risk of MSDs, decreased productivity, and reduced job satisfaction. In severe cases, high physical workload can also lead to long-term health problems, such as chronic pain and disability.

Q: What are some potential solutions to reduce physical workload in the sorting area?

A: Some potential solutions to reduce physical workload in the sorting area include:

Designing ergonomic work facilities, such as rubber transport trolleys, to reduce manual lifting and bending.
Implementing training programs to educate workers on proper lifting techniques and ergonomic work postures.
Conducting regular monitoring of physical workload and evaluating the design of work facilities to ensure their effectiveness in minimizing the health risk of workers.

Q: What is the role of anthropometry in designing ergonomic work facilities?

A: Anthropometry is the study of human body measurements and proportions. In the context of designing ergonomic work facilities, anthropometry is used to create workstations and equipment that are tailored to the specific needs and abilities of workers. By using anthropometry, designers can create work facilities that reduce the risk of MSDs and improve worker comfort and productivity.

Q: What are some potential benefits of implementing ergonomic work facilities in the sorting area?

A: Some potential benefits of implementing ergonomic work facilities in the sorting area include:

Reduced risk of MSDs and other work-related injuries.
Improved worker comfort and productivity.
Increased job satisfaction and reduced turnover rates.
Improved overall health and well-being of workers.

Q: What are some potential challenges to implementing ergonomic work facilities in the sorting area?

A: Some potential challenges to implementing ergonomic work facilities in the sorting area include:

High upfront costs associated with designing and implementing new work facilities.
Resistance to change from workers who may be accustomed to traditional work practices.
Difficulty in measuring the effectiveness of ergonomic work facilities in reducing physical workload and improving worker health.

Q: What are some potential future directions for research on physical workload and ergonomic work facilities?

A: Some potential future directions for research on physical workload and ergonomic work facilities include:

Investigating the effectiveness of different ergonomic design solutions in reducing physical workload and improving worker health.
Developing new methods for assessing physical workload and evaluating the effectiveness of ergonomic work facilities.
Investigating the impact of ergonomic work facilities on worker productivity and job satisfaction.

Q: What are some potential applications of the findings from this study in other industries?

A: The findings from this study have potential applications in a range of industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, and transportation. By understanding the physical workload and ergonomic challenges faced by workers in the sorting area, other industries can develop targeted interventions to reduce the risk of MSDs and improve worker health and productivity.